The convictions today of a number of Oxford men for systematic gang 'rape-prostitution' (as it might be termed) of early-teen and even pre-teen girls, is a clear example of the necessary though not sufficient condition for rape (that is, obvious rape, as commonly understood) possibly to occur of psychologically crossing a major in-group/out-group boundary.
As before, in cases such as in Rochdale, the gang is wholly of ethnic-minority individuals; but it is not down to Pakistani or African culture per se (nor anything else about being Pakistani or African), but is an artefact of ethnic-minorities constituting but a very small proportion of the UK population. For the reason that the great majority of girls likely to be encountered are 'white', then there is often evoked in ethnic-minority males a disinhibiting effect. [This is pronounced in those ethnic-minority communities that, irrespective of the nature of differences from the 'host' or other communities, are most inward-looking and not integrating. Hence the lack of representation in these cases of Indian males in comparison to Pakistanis. This fact also undermines the putative explanation of sexual repression within Asian ethnic minority groups; as if sexual repression however profound could ever explain gang 'rape-prostitution'.]
As a consequence, notwithstanding that the facility to be disinhibited in this way applies equally to the 'host' non-ethnic population; for the reason that 'whites' are in very large majority in the UK, and therefore male 'whites' usually encounter girls who likewise are 'white'; then gang 'rape-prostitution' of very young girls is a phenomenon heavily disproportionately perpetrated by ethnic-minorities, just as the pattern of conviction reveals.
This hits a very raw nerve with the now ubiquitous PC-fascist administration of social services and police (as with every other form of administration in the UK and 'Western' nations in recent years). PC-fascism is the pathological blaming of those that in a political-Left framework are viewed stereotypically as 'the workers' – males, 'whites', heterosexuals – for the failure of any sort of 'Marxist' 'revolution' to take place. As a consequence, non-'whites' abusing 'white' girls, notwithstanding that the abusers are male, has been for 'brushing under the carpet', relatively speaking – in great contrast to the absurd witch-hunt as we see with Operation Yewtree, to police/media trawl for allegations against celebrities, that even when not bogus or heavily inflated and merely mild misdemeanour are pursued regardless.
It is stupid and insulting to everyone for the Children's Commissioner, Sue Berelowitz, to claim on Channel4 News tonight that it is police targeting Asians that has led to Pakistanis and Africans disproportionately being convicted. PC-fascism had led to the very opposite, until the seriousness of the problem became so obvious it could no longer be ignored even from a PC-fascist perspective.
Police in the end are obliged to seek culprits where evidence shows they are most likely to be found. Hence stop-and-search re street-crime will always disproportionately target ethnic-minority males – and males of certain ethnic-minorities in particular. The Home Office some time ago for PC-fascist political reasons prevented breakdown of crime figures re 'mugging' according to ethnicity because of the very large 'over-representation' of Afro-Caribbean perpetrators. The crime figures were no artefact of 'racism' by the police: they were the result, again, of disinhibition through psychologically crossing an in-group/out-group boundary; what PC-fascism would term 'racism' if it were in the other direction. Gang 'rape-prostitution' most certainly would be considered serious 'racism' -- and would be prosecuted as a 'racially-aggravated' crime -- if Pakistani girls were being targeted by 'white' men. Everybody realises this, and it's an accurate perception. The more the political-class pretends otherwise, the greater will mount a popular revulsion towards PC-fascism already evident.